Former Ferrari president Luca Cordero di Montezemolo has weighed in on the controversy surrounding the Scuderia's handling of the team-order situation between Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc during the Dutch Grand Prix. The Italian drew a parallel with a similar episode from his own time at the helm of Ferrari. Ferrari heads into its home Grand Prix at Monza still dealing with the aftermath of what happened at Zandvoort, where the management of Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton became a major talking point. Hamilton was closing rapidly on his teammate and had a chance to fight for the podium. By the time Ferrari eventually separated the two cars through strategy, Hamilton's opportunity to challenge for a top-three finish had effectively slipped away.
In an interview with Quotidiano Nazionale, Montezemolo addressed the criticism aimed at Vasseur following Ferrari's handling of Hamilton and Leclerc at the Dutch Grand Prix. The former Ferrari president believes the wider issue goes beyond what happened at Zandvoort, questioning who within the company Vasseur can rely on when difficult decisions have to be made. In his view, the Frenchman appears isolated and could find himself without sufficient backing if he were forced to make an unpopular call.
Montezemolo drew a comparison with Ferrari's controversial team orders involving Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello in Austria during his presidency in 2002. He recalled how Jean Todt instructed Barrichello to hand victory to Schumacher because the decision was considered to be in Ferrari's best interests. When Barrichello complained, Montezemolo personally intervened to reinforce Todt's authority, making it clear that the Brazilian would have to accept the team's decisions or look elsewhere.
“After the last race in the Netherlands, I heard criticism of Fred Vasseur because he had not issued team orders between Hamilton and Leclerc. However, beyond that particular episode, we should all ask ourselves who the French manager can turn to within the company. I sense Vasseur’s isolation. Who would have his back if he had to make a decision, perhaps even an unpopular one?”
“I don’t want to sound nostalgic, but I remember when Todt, in Austria, ordered Barrichello to let Schumacher win a race because, rightly or wrongly in the eyes of the public, that was in the team’s best interests. He complained a lot. I was the president, so I called him in and told him: I represent Ferrari, you are one of our employees. If you don’t agree with Todt’s decisions, you are free to find another team.”
Leclerc accused of opening 'horrible Pandora's box' at Ferrari after Hamilton drama
Former
Formula 1 driver
Juan Pablo Montoya has criticised Leclerc for ignoring Ferrari's instruction to pit ahead of Hamilton during the Dutch Grand Prix. Speaking to AS Colombia, the Colombian compared the situation with Mercedes' team orders at Zandvoort, where George Russell allowed Kimi Antonelli through to chase eventual winner Lando Norris. Montoya believes Mercedes handled its situation effectively, while Leclerc's refusal to follow Ferrari's call risked undermining the team's authority and creating unnecessary tension within the garage.
Although Montoya does not believe Hamilton would have reached the podium, he feels the seven-time world champion was denied the best possible opportunity after using up his tyres while trying to stay with and overtake Leclerc. In his view, Ferrari should have given Leclerc a clear performance target and a limited number of laps to increase his pace before ordering a position swap or making the pit call. Despite the controversy, Montoya considers tension between teammates a normal part of Formula 1 and believes their relationship does not necessarily have to be as harmonious as it may appear on social media.