Lando Norris has revived an old proposal previously discussed among F1 drivers aimed at ensuring the VSC system produces fairer outcomes on track and does not interfere with the natural dynamics of a race. Norris appeared to have the Madrid Grand Prix under control, holding a lead of more than six seconds before Lance Stroll's stoppage suddenly turned the race on its head. The VSC was called at the worst possible moment for him, who had already crossed the pit entry and therefore had to complete another lap before stopping.
Antonelli and Verstappen were perfectly placed to react, instead, diving into the pits while the field was circulating at VSC speed and significantly reducing the time normally lost during a tyre change. Norris was dealt another blow when his own stop proved slow, with the combination of the unfortunate VSC timing and the delay in the pits costing him two positions.
Speaking to Sky Sports, Norris made clear that his frustration was not directed at McLaren or anyone in particular, but at a rule he believes should not have such a decisive influence on the outcome of a race. The Briton argued that victory should ultimately be determined by performance on track and strategic choices, rather than by the timing of a VSC handing some drivers a significantly cheaper pit stop.
"It's just out of my control, it's just out of their control. It is a rule that should not define a whole race. A race should be won by the guy who can put in the best performance, who maybe takes a risk by going long in a stint."
"Maybe you get a safety car later and things can help you because you know that is one of the big factors, but for everyone to get a safety car, a VSC pit stop, it means nothing. It's unfair but it has happened in the past. Others have won from it. I've probably won from it in the past. But I don't think many people have lost a race win over it so it is frustrating.
He also revealed that the issue had already been discussed in drivers' briefings, with a previous proposal suggesting that the VSC should remain in place for at least one full lap after being deployed. In Norris' view, this would give every driver an equal opportunity to react and avoid situations like Madrid, where he estimated that he alone lost around 20 seconds of race time.
"I don't think it should be the way you lose. We have spoken about it in the past in drivers' briefings and said you should leave it out for at least a lap. So then it is equal for everyone. Today, I was the only one who lost out. And I lost out on about 20 seconds of race time and that is not how it should be."
Norris slams Madring F1 circuit after Spanish GP: ‘It’s not a great racetrack’
Beyond his frustration with the outcome of the VSC,
Norris also criticised certain aspects of the Madring layout, suggesting there are some obvious changes that could improve the quality of racing.
In particular, the McLaren driver called for Turns 18 and 19 to be removed in favour of a more direct run into a hairpin, while stressing that the circuit has the potential to become a much better venue for racing. Although he enjoys driving the track and believes it works particularly well in qualifying, Norris does not currently consider it a great circuit for racing.
"I think there are some obvious changes they should make. They should get rid of 18, 19. Useless. Just have more of a straight into a hairpin. Like, I don’t know how someone looks at this design and goes, “Mint.”
"I think there’s a lot of opportunity. Like I said yesterday, I think they can make it into a track that’s good for racing, and I’m excited to come back here next year if they can make these changes because I think it’s a track that is good fun to drive and it can be a great racetrack. To me, it’s not a great racetrack. It’s great in qualifying."