For many, Jonathan Wheatley’s resignation as Audi team principal was unexpected, including Audi itself. Wasn’t the Brit perfectly settled with the Germans? Or was it Aston Martin’s alleged interest in his services? GPblog spoke with several parties involved over the past week to piece together the events of a turbulent week. When the second race of the season took place in Shanghai, the paddock began buzzing with the rumor that Aston Martin was interested in Jonathan Wheatley to succeed Adrian Newey as team principal.
There was considerable surprise within Audi. Almost immediately, the team’s management asked Wheatley what truth there was to these stories. The Brit, previously working for Red Bull Racing for decades, stated internally that nothing at all was going on. Wheatley repeated this when a journalist from the German newspaper Bild directly asked him about the rumored interest from the team co-owned by Lawrence Stroll.
Still, the rumors kept bubbling up: louder and more frequently. Wheatley was asked again: 'Are you in talks with Aston Martin?' And, just as before, the British team boss said nothing was happening.
Wheatley wanted a meeting with Audi’s CEO
Yet on Thursday, Wheatley informed Audi that he wanted a moment with Gernot Döllner, Audi's CEO. That conversation took place a day later, though schedules didn’t need to be cleared, as originally, a regular meeting had been planned months in advance.
The message Wheatley delivered shocked Döllner. Wheatley indicated that, for personal reasons, he wished to step down immediately as team principal of the Audi
F1 team.
GPblog understands that the main reason for his departure was that Wheatley’s wife was deeply homesick for the United Kingdom and wanted to return home from Switzerland. A move to Aston Martin was not mentioned in that meeting with the CEO, even though it was explicitly asked about.
Barely two hours after the spokesperson for the Audi F1 team told GPblog there were no updates on Wheatley, the press office sent out a release announcing the Brit’s departure after all. It also stated that the reason was “personal.” Aston Martin was not mentioned.
Aston Martin’s statement
Not long after Audi’s announcement, that team also issued a statement. While some may have expected the arrival of Wheatley to be confirmed, Aston Martin stated emphatically that Adrian Newey would remain in his position.
The message by Lawrence Stroll concluded with:
“We are regularly approached by senior executives of other teams who wish to join Aston Martin Aramco, but in keeping with our policy, we do not comment on rumour and speculation.”GPblog had already heard in the days prior to this statement that Newey stepping down as team principal (to focus solely on the technical department) was not on the table at the moment. While it is known that the top designer will step back at some point, he said so himself in Qatar last year, that moment is not now. It could still take quite some time until that happens, possibly even in 2027.
If a successor were to be sought, Wheatley would undoubtedly be on the list, this website understood. Should Aston Martin decide to go for Wheatley at some point, patience will be required anyway. For the next six to twelve months, Wheatley will be at home due to mandatory gardening leave.
Few options for Aston Martin
Beyond Wheatley, there are few alternatives for Aston Martin. Andreas Seidl was in the running, but the German recently declined the job. Christian Horner has been frequently linked to the green team, but the Brit also wants to become a shareholder of an F1 team. Of course, the question is how firm that demand remains if Horner realizes that alternatives in
Formula 1 are scarcely available to him.
After a tumultuous week, there are at least two teams firmly in the spotlight. Wheatley is the person they have in common.
The main character himself has yet to speak. He seems to have deliberately chosen silence. Only Wheatley can ultimately explain all his reasons for leaving Audi. The German manufacturer would very much like to know as well, as there is still a sense that not all the facts are on the table.