+0
21-10-2025 23:22
21-10-2025 16:02
+3
19-10-2025 01:27
+5
21-09-2025 23:57
26-05-2025 12:21
26-05-2025 11:45
21-05-2025 13:24
20-05-2025 15:56
20-05-2025 15:44
Loading
+0
Nitrorex
My perspective remains unchanged; the cause of the accident was Piastri with that brutal change in direction. Hulkenberg?! No way. Brown even apologized to him for his initial public derailment.21-10-2025 23:22
+0
Nitrorex
I agree with you that often the causes of F1 accidents are shared among several drivers. However, in this case, the accident was a direct result of Piastri abruptly changing direction toward the inside of the corner. Among the 4 drivers involved he was the only one not following a "neutral" line in that corner. Obviously he was not aware of the cars around him which makes the move even more dangerous. If he would have kept the line he chose while entering the corner, behind Noris, no accident would have happened. That's why I am saying he is to blame. Maybe the reason he got no penalty is the subjective "first lap" argument however, he remains the one responsible. How about perspective now?21-10-2025 16:02
+3
Nitrorex
Brown tried probably to unconditionally support his driver. But in reality it was 100% Piastri's fault. None of the other drivers did something wrong. I am surprised that Piastri did not get any penalty for causing the collision. Probably because the very inconsistent stewards are trying to not interfere with the drivers championship.19-10-2025 01:27
+5
Nitrorex
What a misleading and pernicious title. Typical GPblog "journalism".21-09-2025 23:57
+0
Nitrorex
Not even you believe that crap, I am pretty sure. :)26-05-2025 12:21
+0
Nitrorex
Windsor only proves again that he is not able to understand F1.26-05-2025 11:45
+0
Nitrorex
Mostly Imola layout...21-05-2025 13:24
+0
Nitrorex
Let's see it first.20-05-2025 15:56
+0
Nitrorex
I wonder if Lewis found his umbrella.20-05-2025 15:44