Ludizapoli
+7363Latest comments
Rumors
Popular on GPBlog
1
Red Bull bids farewell to Tsunoda, Verstappen to get new teammate
41323 times read
2
Yuki Tsunoda out of Red Bull: Who should be Verstappen's teammate?
3217 times read
3
Russell follows in Verstappen's footsteps with the purchase of a lavish toy
1462 times read
4
Red Bull explains the dismissal of Christian Horner as team principal
1364 times read
+0
Ludizapoli
@44 We've gotten into a discussion that's not going anywhere. I don't see the point of it anymore, I've lost the point. If you don't think Max is the best driver, that's fine, that's your opinion and there are certainly many others with the same opinion. I don't see a problem with that, and it's pointless to argue otherwise. But...Max got that recognition (for the first time with max points, that's undeniable). That's what the experts said, and every fan has the right to think what they want about it. You always repeat yourself in our discussions, how I tell you what you think as if you don't know it. That's stupid to me, stop it. I'm not forcing anything on you and I'm not telling you what your opinion is. Yes, I'm just stating my opinion. How I understand and experience you. I'm not forcing anything on you and I'm not imposing anything on you. Regarding the brake valve. The old rules forbid different braking forces, but then the new regulation was not necessary? That's the point, the old rules say it, but teams find a way to take advantage of what the rules don't say exactly clearly. That is why new regulations are being passed, which make these ambiguities impossible. You gave a good example with Das, that turning the wheel like that wasn't forbidden or wasn't even allowed. That's why it was banned only from next year, but it could also be banned with the new regulations in the middle of the season. It is the same example with Brown GP and a double diffuser. They took advantage of that rule hole and won the championship. I think it's best that we both continue to write as we want and as we feel is right. If we're going to be angry about it, I think we can both handle it.10:17
+0
Ludizapoli
@44 Lewis certainly received a lot of recognition for his dominant period, and I can agree that he was the best driver at the time. As Lewis was considered the best then, Max is considered the best today. If that's not the case for you, then someone else is the best for you, but that only applies to you. You say: "that never in history should a driver have been so celebrated and pushed by the media and that it's synthetic hype"...that's your view. You interpret the hype around him that way because you don't like him and dispute his talent. If you think that these overwhelming praises, which there really are a lot of from various experts, like never before for any other driver, are unjustified and that statements from Lauda and his ilk are actually media-inflated, fine, that's your opinion. Don't think so, I'm not convincing you of anything and I have no need to change your opinion at all. You describe the controversial valve as pure cheating, which makes no sense to me, because in today's F1 such things are no longer possible. I see it that way, as someone said, first we read what the rules say, and then we look for what the rules don't say. Those are the gray areas, the loopholes in the rules that all teams use, if they know how. So now mini drs and flexi wings are allowed until they come up with regulations or testing to prevent or prohibit it. Then let's not use... me with superlatives and you with disparaging remarks about Max anymore. I agree.14-07-2025 12:21
+0
Ludizapoli
@44 Max got that recognition, and your opinion or mine about it is completely irrelevant and only matters to us. That Max is a synthetic product of the media is again just your opinion, and creating an image of him as a pious superhero is complete nonsense. If he is just an average driver for you who achieves everything just for the sake of the car, there is no point in me contradicting you and convincing you otherwise. Believe what you want to believe, but I think you will hear about this "fake" hype for a long time. Brake valve - you want RB to cheat and you are sure of it. But if it was just like you say, everyone would cheat and it would be covered up. Today, with all the checks, it is not just like that. They must have had some such valve, but it was like that, like mini drs or flexi wings. Is this allowed? It's not, but it's still being used, until they introduce a new, more precise directive.11-07-2025 16:06
+1
Ludizapoli
Yeah, that would be interesting. Maybe he'd be a few a tenth of a second ahead of Yuki.11-07-2025 08:47
+0
Ludizapoli
@44 Max was declared the best of all team managers, and every fan has the right to think what he wants. I think the example of the speculation was related to the brake valve, not the AD21? There is no need to open new discussions about these old topics. We already had a lot of discussions about it and we told each other everything.11-07-2025 08:43
+0
Ludizapoli
@Vegan If Lewis is the measure, he is a good example - I would even say they are the same age.10-07-2025 15:19
+2
Ludizapoli
There are more and more links around this story. If this were to really happen, Kimi would definitely be a teammate, and that would be the right thing for the team. I know it can't happen, but for fun...I want it so badly to be Russell.10-07-2025 15:15
+2
Ludizapoli
Horner-Lewis VS Toto-Max would be the highlight.10-07-2025 14:56
+0
Ludizapoli
@44 When you say it's a matter of the crowd, it seems as if the profession has no influence, but it certainly does. It's not subjective if a film is declared the best and wins an Oscar, but it is subjective if you disagree with it and it's not your choice. That's a matter of taste, but that film still has that epithet. One has always been declared the best, whether I agree with it or not. There were also previous years when I disagreed with the choice at the time. Exactly what you say about the FIA covering up the scandal, and everything related to that case, is your speculation and connecting events. There is no evidence of that and it doesn't make you wrong - or right. That's exactly what I wanted to mention, that's exactly what I'm doing now. I'm having fun with this situation and speculating, which is not impossible.10-07-2025 13:40
+0
Ludizapoli
@44 I'm not kidding. I've already said that for you that film is not the best and of course you are not forced to agree with such opinions. But for the sake of professional choice, that film has the right to be called and advertised as such, and your choice of the best has the right and basis only for you. Okay, I understand, that bothers you and I will only use the name or without superlatives. Of course we don't know what the real truth is. For example just like we don't know exactly about the decline in RB performance and the brake valve, but in the sequence of events you assume, you are even sure of that statement. You don't know exactly, just from what you know and the events, you logically conclude what could be. ( That's an old debate and we've said it all, there's no need to open a new one). I can say that's how I'm playing with this case too. When we know that there was a sexual incident, tensions within the team, a wave of departures of key professional staff, disappointing performances and results, the possible departure of the driver who is pulling the team could be the last straw.10-07-2025 11:32