+0
13-05-2025 20:02
13-05-2025 16:59
+4
13-05-2025 13:32
13-05-2025 13:27
12-05-2025 21:04
+6
12-05-2025 21:00
12-05-2025 20:18
+5
12-05-2025 20:08
+7
12-05-2025 19:08
12-05-2025 19:01
+0
A3-1963
Unfortunately your comment is still visible, but thankfully not read. For future reference and to get used to it: poster, your comments are hidden and can't be read.13-05-2025 20:02
+0
A3-1963
Why do you keep on trying? I will never again respond on content. I'll skip the 'not interested' from now on as well. No reaction whatsoever. To have to post this is painful enough. Just leave it.13-05-2025 16:59
+4
A3-1963
Oscar and his McL39 are the unit to beat this season.13-05-2025 13:32
+0
A3-1963
Your wasted time13-05-2025 13:27
+4
A3-1963
No it isn't as bad. I do believe that in the past it was easier to do stuff more difficult to notice. Modern media has made it almost impossible. Humans however make mistakes . . .12-05-2025 21:04
+6
A3-1963
Well, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Lets see if Oscar is treated the same way as Max is; it would not surprise me if Oscar is . . . let's say treated with more kindness. But we have an entire season to judge this. Max is a thorn in FiA's side, with his Steward-critique or his not knuckling under . . . so, a small nudge here and there (5 sec for one, nothing for the other) to smooth 'things' along . . . not unthinkable at all.12-05-2025 21:00
+4
A3-1963
not interested not read stalking need hide-option12-05-2025 20:18
+5
A3-1963
not interested not read stalking need hide-option12-05-2025 20:08
+7
A3-1963
Of course Carnivore. When FiA/Steward/Pundit/Celeb says something which can be viewed as negative about Max, the usual suspects celebrate that one. When it is something which can be seen as positive . . . they burn that person to the ground. Oh, and they claim others do this as well . . . while they don't . . . When the fack will that hide-option be re-introduced. I'm so sick of these people.12-05-2025 19:08
+0
A3-1963
stalker.12-05-2025 19:01